1980 International Harvester Scout II Traveler – Classic 4×4 Gem

Home Forums Longue 1980 International Harvester Scout II Traveler – Classic 4×4 Gem

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #570
    ivan.schneidersl
    Participant

      Hey everyone, I recently came across this beautiful 1980 International Harvester Scout II Traveler and wanted to share it with the community. This is a classic American-made SUV that represents an era when vehicles were built tough and simple.

      The Scout II Traveler is known for its reliability and off-road capability. This particular example appears to be in solid condition with the characteristic boxy design that Scout enthusiasts love. The Traveler package added some comfort and convenience features over the base models, making it more livable for longer trips.

      What really strikes me about these vehicles is how they’ve held up over the decades. The mechanical simplicity means owners can actually work on them without specialized computers or proprietary tools. The inline-6 engine and manual transmission combo is legendary for longevity.

      I’m curious what everyone thinks about Scout IIs in general. Are they good investment pieces? How do they compare to Broncos and Blazers from the same era? I’m particularly interested in hearing from anyone who owns or has owned one of these classics. What’s the ownership experience really like? What should potential buyers know before taking the plunge?

      Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and experiences with this iconic vehicle!

      #571
      chloe.patelom
      Participant

        The Scout II is an absolute legend. I’ve always wanted one of these. The Traveler trim is particularly nice because it has the removable top panel option. How much is this one listed for?

        #572
        torsten_hussainc
        Participant

          Beautiful find! The 1980 model year is right in that sweet spot where they fixed most of the earlier Scout II issues but before the market completely moved away from these. The body-on-frame construction makes restoration way easier than modern vehicles.

          #573
          pieroromanokc
          Participant

            That said, the maintenance cost on one of these is going to catch up with you quickly. I looked at a similar year and the undercarriage rust alone would need serious work. Factor in new brakes, hoses, seals, and potentially engine work. Could easily be $5,000-10,000 in repairs within the first year.

            #574
            sofialee183
            Participant

              I have to disagree with the enthusiasm here. These old Scouts drink fuel like crazy and the safety features are basically non-existent by today’s standards. You’re looking at poor visibility, no crumple zones, and minimal braking power. Not sure I’d trust one on modern highways.

              #575
              victor.blanczl
              Participant

                Ivan, have you checked the VIN history on this one? With Scouts you really want to verify the original drivetrain and whether it’s been in accidents. The frame can hide a lot of damage.

                #576
                zara.bernardtf
                Participant

                  The inline-6 in the Scout II is absolutely bulletproof. My uncle had one and drove it past 200k miles with just routine maintenance. These engines are simple enough that owner maintenance is totally doable.

                  #577
                  hollymagnussonce
                  Participant

                    Comparing to Broncos – the Scout is actually better value right now. Broncos have become super trendy and prices have skyrocketed. You can still find reasonable Scout IIs if you’re patient.

                    #578
                    reemfischerwa
                    Participant

                      I think sofialee183 has a point about highway safety. These aren’t vehicles you’d want to commute in daily on interstates. They’re great for weekend use and light off-roading, but not practical as a primary vehicle.

                      #579
                      tariqjonesgv
                      Participant

                        The removable roof panels on the Traveler make it special though. That’s a feature that adds so much versatility. You can enjoy open-air driving without the commitment of a full convertible.

                        #580
                        chad_schmidtp
                        Participant

                          Anyone else concerned about the electrical gremlins on these? The 1980 model still has some of the issues that plagued earlier Scout IIs. The wiring harness can be a nightmare to troubleshoot.

                          #581
                          ivan.schneidersl
                          Participant

                            Great discussion everyone! I appreciate the reality checks. You’re right that maintenance will be ongoing, but I think for someone who understands what they’re getting into, a Scout II can be incredibly rewarding. The key is finding a solid example and being prepared for regular upkeep. These vehicles have a soul that modern SUVs just can’t match.

                            #582
                            julian.robinsoniv
                            Participant

                              The Traveler package is underrated in the collector car market. More people focus on the base Scout II or the fancier versions, but the Traveler hits a nice middle ground with practicality and comfort.

                              #583
                              dianaahmedis
                              Participant

                                Has anyone here had experience with rear axle issues on these? I’ve read that the Dana 44 can develop problems if not properly maintained. What’s the preventative maintenance schedule like?

                                #584
                                eleonora_thomass
                                Participant

                                  Four-wheel drive systems on the Scout II are genuinely excellent. The part-time transfer case is simple and strong. Much more reliable than some of the vacuum-actuated systems competing vehicles used.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
                                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.